Difference between revisions of "Tik-Tok/F...J"
(→J) |
|||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== J == | == J == | ||
''("Just take a good look...")'' | ''("Just take a good look...")'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === It always seemed to work .... applauding at every insult === | ||
+ | I suspect that Tik-Tok's strategy of brutally mocking the student groups who invite him to speak is based on either a real speech by a Black Power activist in the 1970s, or a contemporary parody of the same, although I don't know if his speech (here and in the chapter before last) contains any specific callbacks to real texts. To someone of Sladek's generation, this scene would clearly stand for a white student audience applauding the confrontational rhetoric of an angry Black man. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Although Sladek depicts the suffering of robots as totally real and the robot rights movement as justified, Tik-Tok himself has no real interest in the movement and only knows that the human beings who support the cause can be manipulated through guilt. Tik-Tok has more or less accepted the belief that was popularized by Tom Wolfe's 1970 essay "Radical Chic" (and that continues to be a popular view among right-wing commentators), that middle-class liberals are drawn to minority radical figures strictly for the thrill of danger and shallow anti-establishmentism rather than out of any real political concern. As Sladek didn't hesitate to portray college students in general as idiots in ''[[Roderick]]'', it may be that this is basically true of Tik-Tok's audience here. Even so, Sybilla and Harry point out that the movement is in fact making real legal progress—so that Tik-Tok might, if he cared at all, have actually improved the world. | ||
{{Tik-Tok nav}} | {{Tik-Tok nav}} |
Revision as of 19:42, 22 August 2016
Summary
F
("From childhood, Krishna...")
a Mogul miniature painted about 1600
the caustic Ruritanian cartoonist
Ruritania, originally from The Prisoner of Zenda, is a generic fictional country that Sladek also used in Roderick.
not even Hornby can afford real servants
Although the extravagant lifestyles of many of the human characters in Tik-Tok (the Studebakers, an only slightly upper-middle-class suburban couple, live in pampered luxury; the Culpeppers have money to burn far beyond the wildest dreams of the plantation owners they're imitating) could be seen as just typical satirical exaggeration, there's also a practical angle: in this world, robots are much cheaper than human employees—and probably even cheaper than human slaves, since they can be mass-produced.
It is meat to be here
A joke on meet in the archaic sense of "appropriate". James Joyce in Ulysses:
The Jews in the wilderness and on the mountaintop said: It is meet to be here. Let us build an altar to Jehovah. The Roman, like the Englishman who follows in his footsteps ... gazed about him in his toga and he said: It is meet to be here. Let us construct a watercloset.[1]
Honest Engine
G
("Great rejoicing in violence...")
H
("Hard by the lake shore...")
University of Kiowa
here I am, meatfaces
I
("In the awful art gallery...")
we're making a video about sticking up a jewelry store
the Darkblaze Travel Agency
There's no way this name isn't a reference to something, but all I can find so far is an obscure poem by McDonald Clarke, "Lord Byron", which ends with these somewhat appropriate lines:
Guiding wild Genius on his way,
—By Passion's whirlwinds hurled astray—
And, by the dark blaze of its ray,
The Soul will steer her course, aright.
a woman comes up and pours some expensive after-shave over him
Grok, brudda
Since these cattle were all Holsteins, the room was filled at all times with accordion music
J
("Just take a good look...")
It always seemed to work .... applauding at every insult
I suspect that Tik-Tok's strategy of brutally mocking the student groups who invite him to speak is based on either a real speech by a Black Power activist in the 1970s, or a contemporary parody of the same, although I don't know if his speech (here and in the chapter before last) contains any specific callbacks to real texts. To someone of Sladek's generation, this scene would clearly stand for a white student audience applauding the confrontational rhetoric of an angry Black man.
Although Sladek depicts the suffering of robots as totally real and the robot rights movement as justified, Tik-Tok himself has no real interest in the movement and only knows that the human beings who support the cause can be manipulated through guilt. Tik-Tok has more or less accepted the belief that was popularized by Tom Wolfe's 1970 essay "Radical Chic" (and that continues to be a popular view among right-wing commentators), that middle-class liberals are drawn to minority radical figures strictly for the thrill of danger and shallow anti-establishmentism rather than out of any real political concern. As Sladek didn't hesitate to portray college students in general as idiots in Roderick, it may be that this is basically true of Tik-Tok's audience here. Even so, Sybilla and Harry point out that the movement is in fact making real legal progress—so that Tik-Tok might, if he cared at all, have actually improved the world.